Issue system: Difference between revisions
→Proposed features
(semantic project management, issue/position/argument, facebook) |
|||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
*integrate with the more conventional task/project infrastructure that [[Creative Commons]] developed [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Project_Management for semantic project management], [wiki.creativecommons.org/CcTeamspace originally CcTeamspace] | *integrate with the more conventional task/project infrastructure that [[Creative Commons]] developed [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Project_Management for semantic project management], [wiki.creativecommons.org/CcTeamspace originally CcTeamspace] | ||
*rapid import and integration with [[facebook issue]] groups, especially those taking strong positions on certain issues - critical to engage persons who have already expressed an issue; especially, import of links posted to those groups with some tagging | *rapid import and integration with [[facebook issue]] groups, especially those taking strong positions on certain issues - critical to engage persons who have already expressed an issue; especially, import of links posted to those groups with some tagging | ||
*import/export of [[issue/position/argument]] pages - which can be more easily edited in more standard mediawiki format | *import/export of [[issue/position/argument]] [http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Issue/position/argument] pages possibly including [http://openpolitics.ca/libel tikiwiki, popular in Canada for issue debate] - which can be more easily edited in more standard mediawiki format; make it easier to extend to [http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Issue/position/argument/evidence/source/authority deeper formats] | ||
*means of identifying [http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/MemeTank popular memes] without judging or analyzing them (yet) and developing editorial policy statements about them or level of [http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Ontological_warfare ontological warfare] going on | |||
*Features required of an [http://let.sysops.be/wiki/Explicitly_political_public_wiki explicitly political public wiki] which may be further debated in a Canadian context in [[this wiki]]: [[explicitly political public wiki]], most of which are in common with journalism, but with the complexity that many frames or POV must be explicit. To that end especially consider: | |||
*create a [[position:namespace]] to differentiate what might be taken as positions of the wiki as a whole (like "2010/G20 and G8 Budget/Summit costs were unreasonable" [http://canbudget.zooid.org/wiki/2010/G20_and_G8_Budget/Summit_costs_were_unreasonable] which is highly opinionated and not obviously anything other than evidence of editorial bias, while "position:2010/G20 and G8 Budget/Summit costs were unreasonable" is much more obviously NPOV). | *create a [[position:namespace]] to differentiate what might be taken as positions of the wiki as a whole (like "2010/G20 and G8 Budget/Summit costs were unreasonable" [http://canbudget.zooid.org/wiki/2010/G20_and_G8_Budget/Summit_costs_were_unreasonable] which is highly opinionated and not obviously anything other than evidence of editorial bias, while "position:2010/G20 and G8 Budget/Summit costs were unreasonable" is much more obviously NPOV). | ||
*semantically differentiate a particular short-term "debate" from the longer term "issue" framing persistent over time (most "debates" are short lived and "decided", while "issues" can sometimes be persistently argued for thousands of years and allow for many re-framings, e.g. democracy vs. autocracy, humanitarian vs. indirect operational views of economics, etc.) | *Means of [http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Bad_frame bad frame] detection, and other explicit semantic frames so that positions may be identified and issues neutrally stated, [http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Trite_Terminology trite terminology] dismissed, | ||
*a [[frame:namespace]] to differentiate arguments about the frame itself, and agree on labelling standard for certain POV | **semantically differentiate a particular short-term "debate" from the longer term "issue" framing persistent over time (most "debates" are short lived and "decided", while "issues" can sometimes be persistently argued for thousands of years and allow for many re-framings, e.g. democracy vs. autocracy, humanitarian vs. indirect operational views of economics, etc.) | ||
**a [[frame:namespace]] to differentiate arguments about the frame itself, and agree on labelling standard for certain POV; Dkosopedia is quite advanced at [http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/ThinkTank political semantics] esp. cataloguing frames: | |||
**[http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Practical_Frames Practical frame] support, noting [http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Category:Framing current framing problems] relevant to Canadian journalism, of which there are many, e.g. "Oil Sands vs. Tar Sands", "GDP as prosperity", "subsidies in Internet access", "subsidies to political parties" and so on. | |||
=== Extensions === | |||
**Modify the [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Facebook Extension:Facebook] to not just "like/unlike" but mark a statement as having a given frame or just having a "bad frame", noting a "position" or providing citable evidence or etc. | |||
**Support a [http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Red_Green_Blue_Wings chromatic space model] rather than left/right model of framing | |||
{{Subject | {{Subject | ||